Below are a chart and a video that explain the FULLY LEGAL process for California to secede from America.
EXAMINE: MAP SHOWING PROCESS TO LEGALLY CALEXIT

THREE SEPERATE CALFORNIA ATTORNEYS GENERAL – APPROVED OF THE BALLOT INITIATIVE TO CALL FOR A CALEXIT.

California Attorney General Kathleen Kenealy January 10 2017
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra July 10 2017
California Attorney General Kamala Harris August 28,2015
WATCH: HOW TO CALEXIT – THE DOCUMENTARY
DOWNLOAD: “Golden Guide to Independence” POLICY GUIDE
(How To Calexit is on page 158)
READ: PROCESS TO ACHIEVE CALEXIT – (SCRIPT+ REFERENCES)
PART 1 – CALIFORNIA LAW ON SECESSION:
- Any California resident can file an initiative with the California government to propose a new law.
- An initiative that would have put a question on the ballot for voters to consider “if California should be independent from America” – has been submitted and accepted three times by the California government. Using this process.
- Three separate California Attorneys General have approved separate initiatives calling for a vote on a Calexit.
- The Attorneys Generals have struck down other initiatives as unconstitutional but yet did not strike down this one.
- Judge Strikes Down California’s Ballot Initiative To Kill Gays by Dominic Holden, BuzzFeed News, June 23, 2015
- “State Attorney General Kamala Harris had filed a lawsuit in March to block the initiative, arguing her office should not be required to formulate a ballot description for the measure — which states that gays and lesbians must be “put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.”
- California Attorney General Kathleen Kenealy January 10 2017
- California Attorney General Xavier Becerra July 10 2017
- California Attorney General Kamala Harris August 28,2015
- It is legal to secede — and all of these professors of law, and scholars of history say so. | by Marcus Ruiz Evans | Medium
- The Calexit initiatives are hosted online by the CA secretary of state, and can be copied and resubmitted at any time with text that we know was already approved.
- https://oag.ca.gov/initiatives
- https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/20-0001A1%20(Calexit%20).pdf
- Once you file the initiative, you are told a few months later you can collect signatures. If you get enough signatures, the initiative goes to a vote.
- https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article129047749.html
- https://www.kqed.org/news/11288861/calexit-measure-gets-ok-to-collect-state-ballot-signatures
- https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-secession-ballot-initiative-organizers-signatures/
- On the ballot you can ask California voters if they want California to secede.
- Californians would need to vote over half in support of the question, for the measure to pass.
- This act alone doesn’t make California independent.
PART 2 – FEDERAL LAW ON SECESSION
PART A
- The US constitution says that for legal interpretation of the law, that the Supreme Court should do that.
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx#:~:text=As%20the%20final%20arbiter%20of,Justice%20Charles%20Evans%20Hughes%20observed
PART B
- SCOTUS has only looked at secession one time, in “Texas V White”, and said it is legal with “consent of the states”.
- Most of the time, the media focuses on the part that says you can’t unilaterally secede, which is true. But this other fact is also true.
- Texas V White was decided by Salmon Chase, who was directly appointed by Abraham Lincoln.
- Additionally, Lincoln himself said in his first inaugural address that this form of secession was legal.
- First Inaugural Address of Abraham Lincoln on Monday, March 4 1861, by Yale Law School
- Again: If the United States be not a government proper, but an association of States in the nature of contract merely, can it, as a contract, be peaceably unmade by less than all the parties who made it? One party to a contract may violate it–break it, so to speak–but does it not require all to lawfully rescind it?
- It follows from these views that no State upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the Union;
- I shall take care, as the Constitution itself expressly enjoins upon me, that the laws of the Union be faithfully executed in all the States. Doing this I deem to be only a simple duty on my part, and I shall perform it so far as practicable unless my rightful masters, the American people, shall withhold the requisite means or in some authoritative manner direct the contrary.
- The Chief Magistrate derives all his authority from the people, and they have referred none upon him to fix terms for the separation of the States. The people themselves can do this if also they choose, but the Executive as such has nothing to do with it.
PART C
- Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700 (1868) by Justia, US Supreme Court
- “When Texas became one of the United States, she entered into an indissoluble relation. The union between Texas and the other States was as complete, as perpetual, and as indissoluble as the union between the original States. There was no place for reconsideration or revocation, except through revolution or through consent of the States.”
- Additionally, three separate California attorneys general have approved of this legal interpretation of Texas v white, citing it in their approval of Calexit initiatives.
- It is legal to secede — and all of these professors of law, and scholars of history say so. | by Marcus Ruiz Evans | Medium
- Additionally, the top constitutional scholar in California – Erwin Chemerinsky, said a simple majority vote of Congress could be enough to suffice for CA independence to be legal.
- The California Secession Movement’s Ecstatic Rise and Unexpected Colla | GQ
- Erwin Chemerinsky – Berkeley Law
PART D
- Additionally, there is a reason to believe that America has to recognize a vote for independence from California.
- When the United Nations was formed – America signed a treaty to make it. In that treaty – the UN charter – it states in Article 1, section 2 – that all states have to support the “principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples”
- https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/purposes-and-principles-un-chapter-i-un-charter#:~:text=A.-,Article%201%20(2)%20%2D%20Equal%20rights%20and%20self%2Ddetermination,self%2Ddetermination%20of%20peoples%E2%80%9D.
- According to the Supreme Court treaties supersede all domestic law. Which means the USA government recognizes the right of “self-determination” or the ability to become a nation state.
- https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C2-1-9/ALDE_00012960/
PART E
- Republicans across America hate California. Take a look at this recent poll.
- LA Times poll: Half of U.S. says California declining, 30% of Democrats say ‘too liberal’ By Kenneth Schrupp, The Center Square. Feb 14, 2024
- Forty-eight percent of Republicans went so far as to say the state is “not really American.”
- LAT survey: Half of Republicans believe California ‘not really American’ by Cameron Kiszla, KTLA, Feb 13 2024
PART F
- Additionally, Republicans held a convention recently where they made California the official enemy of the party, and numerous polls have been taken over the years, showing conservative support for a Calexit.
- How California became Trump’s most hated state by Nancy Isenson, DW, 11 23 2018
- Kimberly Guilfoyle trashes California in impassioned RNC speech by ABC 7 News, Aug 25 2020
- “Kimberly Guilfoyle, a campaign adviser for the president and Donald Trump Jr.’s girlfriend, took aim at California during her speech on the first night of the 2020 Republican National Convention.”
- RNC speakers paint California as dangerous dystopia by Michael Finnegan, LA Times, Aug 24 2020
- California-bashing is a constant on Iowa campaign trail by Seema Mehta, LA Times, Jan 15 2024
- Out-of-state conservatives are some of Calexit’s biggest fans by Paul Thornton, Los Angeles Times, Feb 2017
- California Secession Movement ‘Calexit’ Gets a Collective ‘Well, Bye’ from Twitter by Tim Kenneally, The Wrap, Nov 9 2016
- A third of Americans wouldn’t miss California if it seceded: Poll by Valerie Richardson, Washington Times, Mar 1 2017
- Rest of USA to California: Make our day with Calexit by Carl Cannon, Orange County Register, Feb 5 2017Fox News Poll: Voters reveal which state they want kicked out of the union by Fox News
- Americans Have Negative View of California in “State Favorability” Poll: National poll shows respondents overwhelmingly dislike the Golden State, mostly for political reasons by Jonathan Gonzalez< NBC Los Angeles, Feb 24, 2012
PART 3 – BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER
PART A
- The initiative suggests that California appoint its own representative with the express function to appeal to Congress for a vote to leave.
- Because of Hiram Johnson in 1911 – over 100 years ago, Californians directly have radical power in the initiative process. The economist magazine called it the most powerful in all the world.
- We can ignore every politician in Sacramento not supporting this vote and it can still pass and become law, and by law the California government will be compelled to fulfill the elements of the new law.
- Origin of the species: From Athens via Switzerland to the Wild West, The Economist, Apr 23rd 2011
- “California is also unique, in America and the world, in treating every successful initiative as irreversible (unless the initiative itself says otherwise).”
- https://calmatters.org/politics/2018/10/who-created-california-initiative-process/
- “Hiram W. Johnson championed the initiative process in California.”
PART B
- OF course, many politicians will obviously support the idea of California independence, if the initiative is passed by a majority in California – and their support will be welcomed by all lovers of independence.
- Republicans in Congress will vote for the measure to some degree.
- Hopefully Republicans approve the request – California accepts the offer (by virtue of the public initiative that passed a vote) and legally, a path is cleared for California to begin formal negotiations for independence.
- The timeline could look like this:
- https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/ballot-measures/pdf/statewide-initiative-guide.pdf
- STEP 1 – Filing the initiative with the Attorney General
- 2 MONTHS till approved to collect signatures for initiative
- 5 MONTHS / 180 days to collect signatures from public to qualify initiative for the ballot
- 3 MONTHS / 131 days later, if enough signatures collected, the initiative can be placed on the ballot or next election after.
PART C
- If Californians vote for the initiative once it is on the ballot – it could be enacted immediately, and representatives sent to Congress to petition for independence.
- The only study on peaceful initiatives says that they usually take 2 – 4 years maximum of negotiation to finalized the details.
- This is because politicians have to be re-elected, the study argued. Years later, this is exactly how Brexit played out.
- http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1057&context=economicsperg_ppe
- Page 2 __ “negotiations … are fast”
- Page 13 __ “Negotiations about secession are not protracted. When a unit breaks up peacefully, the two sides disengage quickly”
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/08/15/boris-johnson-brexit-legacy/
- “With “get Brexit done” as his slogan, Johnson led his party to a landslide election victory. He succeeded where his predecessor, Theresa May, had failed in getting a deal passed in Parliament and finalized with the Europeans.”
- This is incredibly fast as far as creating new nations goes.
- While it doesn’t stop any bad ideas from the federal government being enacted in California immediately – it would signal to the federal government that perhaps it should not be as rough as it could be about enforcing rules considering the state is about to have a credible vote for secession. Additionally, holding a vote will rally the California public and their elected officials to resist greater any policies from the Federal government deemed horrible. California resisted greatly the administration of Donald Trump at both the people level, up to shutting down entire freeways, and government level and it would do that again on steroids.
PART 4 – CAN’T LOSE
PART A
- If there aren’t enough votes for the initiative to pass, then it doesn’t and California stays.
- HOWEVER – the initiative also requires the creation of an exploratory research committee on the topic of how and if California could survive independently.
- This is called a Blue-Ribbon committee and California does this sort of thing all the time, to create new legislation from emerging issues like legalization marijuana to regulation children’s education.
- VIDEO Blue Ribbon Commission on Early Childhood Education 2019
- Assembly Blue Ribbon Commission Delivers Strategic Vision of Early Childhood Education by Speaker Anthony Rendon, April 21, 2019
- VIDEO California Blue Ribbon Commission Public Forum on Taxation and Regulation 2015
- Blue Ribbon Commission on Marijuana Policy by Blue Ribbon Commission Public Forum on Taxation and Regulation, Jun 12, 2015
PART B
- In Scotland, they did this and called it the Calman commission. It would be years later before Scotland would have a vote to become DEVOLVED from England, and later a vote for full independence. But experts there say it all started with this official report from an official government research project that took the subject seriously. Everyone in Scotland read the “wee blue book” as it was called.
- https://www.theweebluebook.com/wbb/WeeBlueBookDesktopEdition.pdf
- https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04744/SN04744.pdf
- https://www.yeswecan.scot/index.php/knowledgebase/2015-09-26-12-32-43/the-wee-bleu-book
PART C
- His initiative would create a commission here in California of experts to report on all aspects of a potential Calexit.
- A list of experts who have made public contributions to the debate already is prepared and available to the public now in the Golden guide to Independence.
- California has a large and well-educated population, we can fill a commission of experts who report the facts of how CA could survive and why it could thrive independently.
- Even if the report is critical of the venture overall, it will have to admit many facts that are currently unknown to the public about how viable this idea is – that is what happened with the Calman commission. What only a few individual experts knew, the commission made widely available and it caused an explosion in public discussion.
- Something happens signaling American decline that reignites interest in the idea of Calexit. When the US Senate refused to hear information about Brett Kavanaugh before approving him, interest online in Calexit went up. When Roe V Wade was overturned, three newspapers published their own articles talking about a potential Calexit, and of course when America elected someone like Donald Trump, support for Calexit ballooned to 32% overnight.
- https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/calexit-california-secede-trending-donald-trump/
- https://time.com/4564119/california-calexit-donald-trump-victory/
- https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/oct/06/women-brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-feminist-response
- “California has two choices in these dark times: lead or secede” San Francisco Chronicle, July 3 2022
- “California needs to prepare to secede from the nation” JOE MATHEWS, July 1 2022
- “Will abortion decision revive Calexit?” TOM ELIAS, June 29 2022
PART D
- Any person can file a Calexit initiative with the California government. If you filed, your friend can file next time. You can’t file multiple initiatives of the same thing by the same person.
- Californians try again to have a vote and send a representative.
- The California government does something that is seen as offensive by many Republicans across America, like it does naturally all the time. Examples of times California’s government or its citizens have upset many Red states with legislation, or actions were -Pass a law of transgender rights, or Aids victims, or against access to guns, or spent money on billboards in southern states telling people that abortion should be free and that this message came from California, and of course banning CA sports teams from playing with teams in Republicans states.
- California governor launches ads to fight abortion travel bans by Associated Press, Feb 25, 2024
- The multistate ad campaign and an online petition effort will launch Monday, beginning with a TV commercial about a measure under consideration in Tennessee.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_state-funded_travel_ban
- https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-06-05/california-shows-that-stricter-gun-laws-save-lives-proof-other-states-should-heed-not-dismiss
- https://www.hivlawandpolicy.org/news/cnn-fact-check-boebert-falsely-claims-liberals-have-legalized-knowingly-spreading-hiv-2021
- https://apnews.com/article/misinformation-lgbtq-transgender-california-custody-3cc6d2b5282d6b0e8ba9d1ffc55edeb7
PART E
- Republicans vote in a higher percentage to let CA leave.
- The cycle repeats as the USA continues to politically divide to levels, according to some professors, not seen since before the Civil War.
- https://www.hks.harvard.edu/wiener-conference-calls/robert-putnam#transcript-1635546
- In fact, we’re probably more polarized than we have been at any period in American history with the exception, but it’s not a big exception. In measured terms it’s only a little more polarized of 1860 to 1865. America is—except in our Civil War—we’ve never been as divided politically as we are today.
PART F
- For comparison. The right for women to vote was first proposed in Congress in 1878, and not passed until 1920. But each attempt brought women’s rights advocates closer to success by raising awareness.
PART G
- And what if Californians file the initiative and it doesn’t pass the first time.
- Marijuana legalization passed by initiative in California. It took multiple tries for the initiative to finally be approved, but with each campaign, even though it didn’t pass, they increased public awareness, public education, and ultimately public support for the ideas.
- Many Californians shifted in support of both ideas between the first and last time the initiatives were filed.
- https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-pol-ca-prop-64-last-time-california-tried-to-legalize-weed/
- https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/proposition-19-results-california-votes-reject-marijuana-measure/story?id=12037727
PART H
- This is exactly what happened with Women’s right to vote legislation at the Federal level.
- Also, a key reason that the Marijuana initiative passed was because an “angel donor” gave millions of dollars to help hire signature gatherers so that initiative would qualify for a vote.
- The initiative to ban Gay Marriage also received a angel donor who spent over a million dollars in California to stop the initiative.
- Both initiatives received angel donors because they had been promoting this idea for years, and these two billionaires heard about it.
- https://www.businessinsider.com/sean-parker-legalize-marijuana-california-2016-11
- “Those in favor of the decision owe a big thanks to billionaire Silicon Valley fixture Sean Parker. The former Facebook president and founder of Napster contributed $8.5 million to the effort to legalize recreational marijuana in California.”
- https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/wealthy-gay-men-backed-anti-prop-8-effort-3261864.php
- “Bohnett, who gave $1.2 million to the effort to block Prop. 8”
- Having angel donors support your initiative so that it qualifies for the ballot – is completely legal and happens with almost every initiative that passes in California.
PART 5 – IN SUMMARY:
- File the initiative – that is publicly available.
- If it doesn’t get enough signatures – file, it again and use it as a chance to educate more people.
- When you get enough signatures – it goes for a vote.
- If you get enough votes if goes to Congress.
- If you don’t get enough votes in Congress – file, it again and use it as a chance to educate more people.
- If you get to Congress and Republicans vote for it – start negotiations for independence.
- If you get to Congress and Republicans don’t vote for it enough – file it again and count on American continuing to decline and California to continue to upset traditional Republicans in most American states.
TEXT TO FILE FOR INITIATIVE
TEXT (YOU CAN) FILE FOR INITIATIVE
SAMPLE COVER LETTER:
Xavier Becerra, Attorney General
ATTN: Initiative Coordinator
P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
July 3, 2020
Re: request for title and summary
Pursuant to Article II, Section 10(d) of the California Constitution, this letter respectfully
requests that the Attorney General prepare a circulating title and summary of the
enclosed ballot measure: “Calexit: The California Independence Plebiscite of 2024,”
which amends the Government and Elections Code.
Also enclosed are the required signed statements pursuant to California Elections Code
9001 and 9608, and a check in the amount of $2000.
Please direct all inquiries and correspondence regarding this proposed initiative to:
Marcus Ruiz Evans
President, Yes California Independence Campaign
6083 N. Figarden Drive, #356
Fresno, California, 93722
SAMPLE TEXT: CALEXIT: THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENCE PLEBISCITE OF 2024
An act to add Article 6 to Chapter 1 of Division 1 of Title 1 of
the Government Code, relating to the establishment of a
commission of inquiry on California sovereignty and independence
from the United States of America, and Division 22 to the
Elections Code, relating to an independence plebiscite.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. THE INDEPENDENCE PLEBISCITE OF 2024
Division 22 is hereby added to the Elections Code, to read:
DIVISION 22. THE INDEPENDENCE PLEBISCITE OF 2024
22002. On November 5, 2024, the election date for even-year
statewide elections established by Division 1 of this Code,
the Secretary of State shall submit the following
independence plebiscite question to the voters:
“Should California leave the United States and
become a free and independent country?”
22003. The words “Yes” and “No” on separate lines with an
enclosed voting space to the right of each shall be placed
to the right of the independence plebiscite question.
22004. The independence plebiscite shall constitute a vote
of no confidence in the United States of America and an
expression of the will of the people of California to
become a free and independent country if both of the
following conditions are met:
(1) At least 50% of registered voters participate.
(2) At least 55% vote “Yes.”
22005. Pursuant to the conditions in Section 22004 having
been met, the independence plebiscite shall be deemed
approved by the voters of this state. As a result, the will
of the people of California to establish a free and
independent country shall be in the public record.
22006. Pursuant to the conditions in Section 22004 having
been met, neither California’s system of government nor its
relationship with the United States shall change.
22007. Pursuant to the conditions in Section 22004 having
been met, the United States national flag shall be removed
from public display at all California government buildings,
including the State Capitol, and at all public properties
under the jurisdiction of the California state government.
22008. The California state flag shall thereafter be
displayed in position of first honor at all California
government buildings, including the State Capitol, and at
all public properties under the jurisdiction of the
California state government.
22009. For the fiscal year starting July 1, 2024, the
Governor shall include in the Governor’s Budget submitted
to the Legislature pursuant to Section 12 of Article IV of
the California Constitution amounts of funding necessary
for the Independence Plebiscite to be held pursuant to the
provisions of this act.
22010. The Legislature shall make the necessary
appropriation in the budget act for the fiscal year
starting July 1, 2024 to ensure the independence plebiscite
question is added to the 2024 election ballot in accordance
with the provisions of this act.
SECTION 2. THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY AND
INDEPENDENCE FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The following Article is hereby added to Chapter 1 of Division 1
of Title 1 of the Government Code, as follows:
ARTICLE 6. THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY
AND INDEPENDENCE FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [220-225]
220. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COMMISSION.
220.1 The Commission on National Sovereignty and Independence
from the United States of America (in this Article
referred to as the “Commission”) is hereby established as
an independent, nonpartisan commission of inquiry.
220.2 It is the sense of the people of California that
individuals serving on the Commission should be prominent
residents of the state with significant depth of
experience in such professions as governmental service,
law, public administration, economics, commerce, business,
civil rights, academics, and history.
220.3 It is the intent of the people of California to create a
Commission that is independent from legislative influence
and reasonably representative of the state’s diversity.
221. PURPOSE AND FUNCTION.
221.1 The purpose and function of the Commission is to prepare a
complete public report on California sovereignty and
independence from the United States of America, and to
specifically:
a) ascertain, evaluate, and report on the current ability of
the State of California to govern itself independently
should the need arise due to an unforeseen collapse of the
United States government, open rebellion, revolution, or in
the event of civil war.
b) ascertain, evaluate, and report on the future economic and
political viability of California as an independent
country, including its ability to defend itself;
c) ascertain, evaluate, and report on the global use of
ranked-choice voting and other proportional representation
systems, and recommend which, if any, should be established
in the event California becomes an independent country;
d) study, evaluate, and report on the global use of
plebiscites as a peaceful means to obtaining independence;
e) analyze and report to the public on its findings,
conclusions, and recommendations.
222. COMPOSITION OF THE COMMISSION.
1.1 The Commission shall be composed of 20 members, of whom –
(1) Ten (10) shall be male
(2) Ten (10) shall be female
(3) Eight (8) shall identify as “Latino.”
(4) Seven (7) shall identify as “Caucasian.”
(5) Three (3) shall identify as “Asian.”
(6) One (1) shall identify as “African American.”
(7) One (1) shall identify as “Other” race
223. QUALIFICATIONS AND DISQUALIFICATIONS TO SERVE.
223.1 An individual may not serve on the Commission if he or she
is an officer or employee of the Federal Government of the
United States, or any State or local government.
223.2 The people of California hereby establish the following
additional criteria for serving on the Commission:
a) No person shall be eligible to serve on the
Commission who has not been a resident of the State
of California for at least five (5) years immediately
preceding November 8, 2022.
b) No person shall be eligible to serve on the
Commission who has not earned a degree from an
institution accredited by the University of
California.
c) No person shall be eligible to serve on the
Commission who, within the 10 years immediately
preceding November 8, 2022, neither the applicant,
nor a member of his or her immediate family, may have
done any of the following:
(1) Been appointed or elected to any federal or
state office, or
(2) Served as an officer, employee, or paid
consultant of a qualified political party or
of the campaign committee or a candidate for
elective federal or state office, or
(3) Served as a member of a qualified political
party central committee, or
(4) Been a registered federal, state, or local
lobbyist, or,
(5) Served as paid congressional, legislative, or
Board of Equalization staff member, or
(6) Contributed $2,000 or more to any
congressional, state, or local candidate for
elective public office.
d) No person shall be eligible to serve on the
Commission who were staff or consultants to, persons
under a contract with, or any person with an
immediate family relationship with the Governor, a
member of the Legislature, a current or former member
of the United States Congress, or a member of the
State Board of Equalization.
(1) As used in the above subdivision d, a member of
a person’s “immediate family” is one with whom
the person has a bona fide relationship
established through blood or legal relations,
including parents, children, siblings, and in-
laws.
224. CANDIDATE APPLICATION PROCESS
224.1 Any person qualified to serve on the Commission pursuant
to Section 223 of this Act may declare their candidacy by
submitting to the Secretary of State an application of
interest that is substantially biographical in nature.
224.2 The application of interest shall include, but shall not
be limited to, each of the following biographical pieces
of information, but may contain any such information
deemed necessary and appropriate by the Secretary of
State:
a) Full legal name
b) Date of birth
c) Sex as indicated on birth certificate
d) Race (options shall be limited to: “Latino,” “Caucasian,”
“Asian,” “African-American,” “Other” and applicants shall
be instructed to choose the category that best represents
their race.)
e) Current home address
f) Date California residency established
g) Name of educational institution attended
h) Dates attended and date of graduation
i) Type and field of degree earned
224.3 The Secretary of State shall additionally create
declarations under penalty of perjury affirming the above
information, as well as affirming that the applicant is in
fact eligible to serve on the Commission (is not
disqualified per Section 223 of this Act) to be signed
before a witness at the time of application.
224.4 The applicant shall be required to submit a copy of his or
her birth certificate, passport, driver license, or other
government-issued document verifying the applicant’s name,
date of birth, and sex.
224.5 The applicant shall be required to submit a copy of his or
her driver’s license or other government-issued document
verifying the applicant’s current home address.
224.6 The applicant shall be required to submit a copy of his or
her degree, transcripts, or other documents issued by the
educational institution verifying the applicant received a
degree upon their successful completion of study.
224.7 The applicant shall be required to submit the names,
addresses, and signatures of a hundred registered voters,
who, by providing their signatures, nominate the applicant
as a candidate to serve on the Commission.
224.8 The Secretary of State shall establish a process
substantially similar to the process by which a candidate
is nominated as a candidate for elective office by
petition, including a procedure to verify signatures.
225. SELECTION PROCESS
225.1 The Secretary of State, using data obtained from the
applicants’ applications of interest, shall create a
master pool of candidates from which twenty will be
randomly chosen.
225.2 The random selection of candidates shall take place
substantially in the following manner:
a) Applicants shall be categorized based on the
biographical information provided in their applications
of interest such so that each candidate is categorized
into the appropriate age and race groups.
b) The applicants shall first be divided into a male pool
and a female pool of candidates.
c) Using racial data obtained from the male applicants’
applications of interest, 4 Latino, 3 Caucasian, 2
Asian, and 1 Other shall be selected randomly from the
male pool of candidates, so that there are ten males
fairly representative of California’s racial diversity.
d) Using racial data obtained from the female applicants’
applications of interest, 4 Latino, 4 Caucasian, 1
Asian, and 1 African American shall be selected randomly
from the female pool of candidates, so that there are
ten females fairly representative of California’s racial
demographic.
225.3 The Commission shall therefore consist ten male (50%) and
ten female (50%), of which eight are Latino (40%), seven
are Caucasian (35%), three are Asian (15%), one is African
American (5%), and one is Other (5%).
226. MEETINGS; PUBLICATION OF REPORT.
226.1 The Commission shall meet and begin the operations of the
Commission as soon as practicable, but no later than
August 1, 2023, and conclude its work and publish its
report no later than August 1, 2024.
226.2 The Commission shall include in its final report a summary
of its findings, conclusions, and recommendations
specifically to be published in the Secretary of State’s
official Voter Information Guide for the 2024 Statewide
General Election.
227. QUORUM; VACANCIES.
227.1 After its initial meeting, the Commission shall meet upon
the call of the chairman, whom shall be elected together
with the vice chairman (as well as any other officers
deemed necessary by the members) during their first
meeting, or a majority of its members. Twelve members of
the Commission shall constitute a quorum.
227.2 Any vacancy in the Commission shall not affect its powers
but shall be filled in the same manner in which the
original vacancy was filled.
228. POWERS OF COMMISSION.
228.1 The Commission or, on the authority of the Commission, any
subcommittee or member thereof, may, for the purpose of
carrying out this Article:
a) hold such hearings and sit and act at such times
and places, take such testimony, receive such
evidence, administer such oaths; and
b) require, by subpoena or otherwise, the attendance and
testimony of such witnesses and the production of such
books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, and
documents, as the Commission or such designated
subcommittee or designated member may determine advisable.
229. SUBPOENAS.
229.1 In general, a subpoena may be issued under this subsection
only:
a) by the agreement of the chairman and the vice chairman; or
b) by the affirmative vote of 11 members of the Commission.
229.2 Subject to clause (a), subpoenas issued under this
subsection may be issued under the signature of the
chairman or any member designated by a majority of the
Commission, and may be served by any person designated by
the chairman or by a member designated by a majority of
the Commission.
229.2 In the case of contumacy or failure to obey a subpoena
issued under this Act, the United States district court
for the judicial district in which the subpoenaed person
resides, is served, or may be found, or where the subpoena
is returnable, may issue an order requiring such person to
appear at any designated place to testify or to produce
documentary or other evidence.
229.3 Any failure to obey the order of the court may be punished
by the court as a contempt of that court.
230. COMPENSATION FOR MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
230.1 The members of the Commission shall be compensated at the
rate of three hundred thirty-five dollars ($335) for each
day the member is engaged in Commission business.
230.2 The members of the Commission shall be eligible for
reimbursement of personal expenses incurred in connection
with the duties performed pursuant to this act. A member’s
residence is hereby deemed to be the member’s post of duty
for purposes of reimbursement of expenses.
231. APPROPRIATIONS OF STATE FUNDS FOR COMMISSION.
231.1 For the fiscal year starting July 1, 2023, the Governor
shall be included in the Governor’s Budget submitted to the
Legislature pursuant to Section 12 of Article IV of the
California Constitution amounts of funding for the
Commission established by this act that is sufficient to
meet the Commission’s estimated expenses.
231.2 The Legislature shall make the necessary appropriation in
the budget act for the fiscal year starting July 1, 2023
to ensure the Commission may start and complete its work
on time.
231.3 The Governor shall make adequate office space available
for the operation of the Commission.
LAST PAGE – SEPARATE PAGE
I, ________________________, declare under penalty of perjury that I am a citizen of the
United States, 18 years of age or older, and a resident of ___________ county, California.
I, ___________________________, acknowledge that it is a misdemeanor under state law
(Section 18650 of the Elections Code) to knowingly or willfully allow the signatures on
an initiative petition to be used for any purpose other than qualification of the proposed
measure for the ballot.
I certify that I will not knowingly or willfully allow the signatures for this initiative to be
used for any purpose other than qualification of the measure for the ballot.
_________________________________
(Signature of Proponent)
Dated this ______ day of ______, 20_____
AUTHORS
